its own, and computers didn't know how to get through. 1.xxy IP with error that it couldn't connect to TV service, so looked like router was handing out different DHCP IP vs. I checked the TV box connected to the router, and it also had 192.168. This is odd because my internal network where I have medias, raspberryPi, and other devices directly connected runs on 192.168.1.1. I looked at the auto-IP configuration on my computer, and it picked up 192.168. When I went to the router web 192.168.2.1 (default), I saw that the no device was shown with DHCP lease, and in the logs, it said DHCP assignment had failed. I was connected directly to the router, and nothing worked. After the reset, and configuration, I could not connect to the internet. Of course, the DHCP tables were cleaned, because of the reset.
I had no issues until last week, where I decided to reset my router because of forgotten settings. My Speedport Smart 3 router upgraded to the new firmware 010137.4.6.001.2. Also, um Verwirrung zu vermeiden, werde ich in Englisch schreiben. Hallo, es tut mir leid, mein Deutsch ist nicht sehr gut. when QNAP "fixes" something else dodgy in their firmware - which seems like every few weeks.Īny advise and/or alternatives on the HW selection would be most appreciated. and taking the network down every time I have to do NAS maintenance, etc. I'm tired of QNAP's dodgy Network vSwitch BUI tools changing my networks out from under me every time I try to create a new private vSwitch for a test env. stability/reliability of the QNAP OS and maintenance BUI sucks. Truth be told, this VM is overkill resource-wise as I rarely get over 12-20% CPU or 30% memory utilization - that's without the VPN, but.
Have been running pfSense 2.4.4-p2 in a 2vCPU/8G VM on a dual-cpu i7-6700 3.4GHz 4-core QNAP NAS with 64GB RAM. Would like to enable OpenVPN for for some classes of out-going traffic and for incoming client devices - but won't even start thinking of any of that until on a hardware solution. I'm supporting both residential and 12hx5d business traffic on this connection. PFBlockerNG, snort, squid, squid rev-proxy, lightsquid, bandwidthd, ntopng.Ĭurrently have a 300/50 mbit WAN connection, anticipating 1gbps fiber in the near future.
Note: I don't really need the 10G SFP+ ports yet as switches only have 1G SFP (not used) and I still have plenty of RJ45 copper ports open to use for the router interconnects. With Intel Xeon D-1518, Dual 10G SFP+, 6 GbE LAN, IPMI I'm narrowing down my options for a HW build for pfSense.
0 kommentar(er)
